<p>One of Congress’ many responsibilities is to ensure competition in the marketplace.<img src="http://www.fmi.org/images/default-source/blog-images/fmi-in-the-news.png?sfvrsn=0" data-displaymode="Original" alt="FMI in the news" title="FMI in the news" style="float: right; margin: 10px;" /> FMI and member companies appreciate the legislative work that has been done to increase innovation in the payments system, specifically debit transactions. The passing of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was a step in the right direction of addressing a broken system. Retailers hope Congress will leave the successful Durbin amendment in place so that the American economy will continue to thrive.</p> <p>The following opinion piece appeared in <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/294023-why-rollback-competition-now">The Hill on September 1, 2016</a>:</p> <p><strong>Why rollback competition now?</strong></p> <p>By: Jennifer Hatcher, Senior Vice President, Government and Public Affairs, Food Marketing Institute<br /> <br /> A successful American economy relies on open and free competition. Sometimes, competition get stifled and government must step in to break up monopolies and other anti-competitive schemes.</p> <p>Congress did this in 2010, addressing a broken market by including debit reforms in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The debit reforms, or “Durbin Amendment”, brought transparency and predictability into a pricing scheme where previously there was none; and required networks to compete for merchant business. These procompetitive reforms are working and Congress should oppose current efforts to roll them back.</p> <p>Prior to 2010, Visa and MasterCard paid large banks to sign network exclusivity contracts. Historically, debit cards had multiple enabled networks that a transaction could be routed through, each competing for merchant routing business. The exclusivity contracts only allowed one network on the card, leaving the merchant with no routing choices. As a result, Visa was able to route 79% of all debit transactions from its ten largest issuing banks. Lack of competition artificially inflated network fees and grocers had no ability to negotiate these costs. <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/294023-why-rollback-competition-now">See the full story in The Hill</a>. </p>
Powered by Versicherungsvergleich





